How do we “forgive” the “press” and the entire claque of “MDs” in America?
What would that look like?
Should we offer them some new type of sort of psychotherapy sessions?
(“Dont feel bad everyone missed it; the entire HHS.gov messed it up and are now pretending this Johnstown Flood of disability needs a band aid in the form of an HIV non-scientist to pretend he’s never heard of acquired immune deficiencies – plural – to head up this inquiry?”)….
(“Dont feel bad that medical schools didnt require any of you to have a science background?”)
(“It’s not your fault that you believed in witches -‘somatoform’ means magic, technically – because even Simon Wessely did and he is a UK ‘knight’ or ‘sir’ or something?” … “Sir Simon Said Somatoform So Silly was Serious until 2018 A.D.”…
(How about something memorable like a nursery rhyme on Simple Silly Sir Simon Said Somatoform Sorcery, and the Saxon Queen approved…)
In 22 years, I aint never seen the press or LLMDs or ILADS get this right – I mean PUBLISH this explanation. You can tell for sure since Mary Beth Pfieffer wrote about the most recent Texas RICO suit in HuffPo, but she got it wrong, still. Again.
STUFF THAT NEVER GETS ANY PRESS:
Former CT, now U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal sued IDSA for RICO in 2006, and Ben Luft told the FDA that LYMErix was causing a disease like chronic Lyme (“protean”) in 1998. In 2002, Donald Marks, an rOspA vaccine trial administrator, told the FDA that rOspA injections were causing neurologic disease (the “case definition” excludes these as “Lyme,” now we know why: late neuro Lyme is more about EBV and post-sepsis syndrome).
Blumenthal subpoenaed IDSA’s documents but they never turned them over, so I re-sent Blumenthal’s office the 1989 IDSA reviews where IDSA says tmt failed in half the cases and the CDC said basically “we dont know how to treat this, since the treatment for syphilis fails too.” (The first copy was stolen off Blumenthal’s desk.)
And even the NIH – Marques and Martin, who ran the “MS and Lyme Division” of the NINDS – wrote that LYMErix was a disease of immunosuppression. But none of this ever got any actual press. Not even the “LLMDs” talk about it. It’s like the elephant in the livingroom. NIAID, CDC, IDSA, ALDF and other Lyme criminals never recognized there was another division in the NIH focused on the neurologic outcomes of the New Great Imitator, MS and Lupus – NINDS.
There WAS a special division of the NINDS.gov dedicated to discovering how Lyme caused MS. MS is not a bad knee, but the CDC and ALDF.com maintain that Lyme only causes arthritis.
It is generally accepted that MS and RA or arthritis are mutually exclusive.
NO PRESS, NO SELFIE-ALLEGED LYME SPECIALISTS or ILADS and no NON-PROFIT ever published or even off the record questioned or discussed how LYMErix caused the same “protean” or “multi-system” (Persing and Schoen) disease we call “Chronic Lyme,” or ever published any kind of question or hypothesis as to why we have the same outcome from LYMErix as we do from Lyme. (“Could LYMErix be reactivating spirochetes? Or something else? If so/either, HOW???!!” – Nope, they never asked or wondered outloud. You have NEVER SEEN IT.)
Why? Obviously people would say, “Oh, maybe THAT’s why no one gets better from ILADS’ tmts. OspA alone causes the same disease, It’s not about spirochetes…”
The elderly Lyme victim/activists, having attended the Lyme Disease Foundation’s annual scientific (really, and they were mainly NOT about treatment but basic spirochete science) heard from the likes of Mario Philipp (Tulane, monkeys) that rOspA induced the immunosuppressive cytokine IL-10 and this was even discussed numerous times in the late 1990s on the E-list that became ILADS.org.
Ben Luft (SUNY-SB) said at the 1998 FDA meeting on LYMErix that he was surprised that the adverse events being reported were more like chronic Lyme disease itself and not like the “arthritis-only” myopic perception of Allen Steere et al of the ALDF.com (dot com because it really is a commercial enterprise),
“The point that I wanted to make in regard to the study is that there is very heavy dependence on serologic confirmation. And when we start thinking about the adverse events, *** it was stated originally when we got the overview of the disease that the disease is really quite protean. And actually the adverse events are very similar to what the disease manifestations are.**** “…
Therefore we have for the last 25+ years had this false dichotomy over whether or not antibiotics cure Lyme disease or spirochetes, when LYMErix did *SOMETHING* such that 1100 adverse events were reported to the FDA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) by the fall of 2000, upon which the FDA granted a public hearing in January, 2001. A year later the FDA granted another hearing to the Lyme disease association (LDA, lymediseaseassociation.org) upon which one of the two rOspA vaccines’ trial administrators, Donald Marks reported that OspA caused a neurologic disease outcome:
LYMErix was ordered off the market by the FDA a month later, via an ultimatum they issued to Yale and SmithKline: “Either you pull LYMErix off voluntarily or we will order it off the market.” LYMErix was withdrawn Feb 26, 2002. Everyone should KNOW there was a fraudulent “vaccine” for Lyme that came and went. Certainly “doctors” should.
The ALDF.com and CDC maintain that Lyme is only a “monoarticular arthritis.” Most recently, the CDC published another article asking whether other Borrelia in the USA caused arthritis:
“These results demonstrate broad PCR screening followed by MLST is a powerful surveillance tool for uncovering the spectrum of Borrelia species causing human disease, improving understanding of their geographic distribution, and investigating the correlation between B. burgdorferi STs and joint involvement.”
[All the CDC cares about is arthritis. Amazing since they performed the Tuskegee and Guatemala syphilis experiments EXACTLY because they wondered why more caucasians got dementia from syphilis than other races. I propose dementia does not happen to joints.]
Yet the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke’s Roland Martin and Adrianna Marques headed up that Divisions’ Lyme and Multiple Sclerosis group. Most doctors are supposed to know that MS and Rheumatoid Arthritis are generally mutually exclusive.
Martin and Marques found and reported that the Osps or the fungal, TLR2/1 agonists fungal endotoxins of spirochetes cause global immunosuppression but with the opposite immune response in the central nervous system compartment.
It all makes sense when you take a look at how many CDC officers or former CDC officer and even the former head of the NIH’s Rocky Mountains Lab have patents for tick borne disease recombinant antigens that would be worthless commercially if the public knew these fungal antigens cause immunosuppression in most people (except apparently in the 10-15% of caucasian human population with a genetic predisposition to arthritis).
So, here we have the CDC and ALDF.com saying Lyme is only an arthritis (helps, commercially), while the NIH says it causes neurologic disease,… while Luft, Marks, and Persing say it is “multisystem,” “protean” and “you cant tell the difference between late neurologic Lyme and LYMErix disease” (“indistinguishable” – Persing or in Mayo Clinic’s patent:
Method for detecting B. burgdorferi infection
“…Additional uncertainty may arise if the vaccines are not completely protective; vaccinated patients with multi-system complaints characteristic of later presentations of Lyme disease may be difficult to distinguish from patients with vaccine failure.”).
What’s remarkable is no journalist or anyone with “MD” after their names that we know of, much less a self-proclaimed LLMD ever asks the question publicly or mentions it when interviewed by the press. LYMErix causes the same multisystem disease. What is the real question?
You’d think a journalist or an “MD” would find it curious that the same crowd who say “Lyme is easy to diagnose and cure” are also the ones who put out a vaccine for this disease that hardly needs any healthcare attention, who are also the same ones who are furious that the FDA gave GSK an ultimatum in February 2002, to either voluntarily withdraw LYMErix or the FDA would order it off the market and blamed “anti-Vaxxers,” literally, a term not even in use at the time.
1— Blumenthal thinks this is a criminal organization.
2— Ben Luft told the FDA in ’98 that you cant tell the difference between LYMErix disease and Lyme disease (Persing and Schoen said the exact same thing in their RICO patent of 1995).
3— Donald Marks tried to tell the FDA directly that LYMErix was causing a neurologic disease while the “case definition” says no such thing.
4— Martin and Marques of the NIH ran the “MS and Lyme Division” and reported in 2006 that OspA caused global, humoral immunosuppression with chronic brain inflammation, and then that division apparently dissolved and ***Marques joined the crooks side at NIAID*** and Roland Martin went back home to Germany.
Conclude that either the CDC is covering for each others’ stupid crimes (most of this was conducted before the innernets and we all then had access to the forensic evidence) or Lyme is an accidental release. It was only in 1994 that TLR2 was discovered and described. Experiments with TLR2 agonists show us that mainly FUNGAL antigens are handled by those, and the tri-acylated lipoproteins are worse endotoxins than LPS (TLR4) – the immunosuppression from this sepsis is NOT reversible.
Neither the press of any kind, nor any “MD” nor any “LLMD” ever told the story publicly. You have never seen it.
You have NEVER SEEN in the press of any kind, how the case definition was falsified. You’ve never seen ILADS explain it at any conference. You have NEVER seen a paper by anyone at ILADS explaining how OspA alone caused the same disease they treat with antibiotics.
The story is really about how there’s no story, isnt it.